[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GEMPAK #ULB-565723]: garp fails on model data

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [GEMPAK #ULB-565723]: garp fails on model data
  • Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:54:50 -0700
Tom,

The $GARPHOME/config/Garp_defaults has a entry at line 445:
#
# Widget defaults
#
# Choose default values for the model, vertical coordinate, levels,
# function, default fdf chapters, cross-section line, time-height
# station, vertical profile axis types, radar ring station, upper
# air levels and upper air filter.
#
model           : eta


The "eta" name is aliased in $GEMTBL/config/datatype.tbl as the nam211 data set.
In your case, you have a 12km nam, but not that default 80km nam. 
You can either redefine the "ETA" default to point to your 12km NAM set in 
datatype.tbl
(eg the $MODEL/nam12km/ directory) or change the entry from "eta" to nam12:
model            : nam12

You will also want to ad that modelkey and modellabel since the 12km grid 
insn't in the default list.

There was a filled contour bug in Garp with 5.10.4 which is fixed in the 
upcoming 5.11.1 distribution.

Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support





> 
> Steve,
> 
> I see this problem has come up before, but i don't
> see a solution. Garp dies on me with a segmentation
> fault when I try to pull up model data.
> 
> This is the latest binary of gempak, just downloaded,
> on a Fedora 8 system. (I am setting up one system, and
> the remaining systems will be "ghosted" in our lab.)
> 
> I actually deleted all the model output and waited
> until LDM fill in some new data (in case any of the
> old files were bad, 0 size, etc.) Same result. Below
> is a list of files in $MODEL. Any suggestions???
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Tom
> 
> ------
> 
> [metuser@localhost model]$ ls -lR $MODEL
> /data/gempak/model:
> total 24
> drwxr-xr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 2007-12-10 14:35 gfs
> drwxrwxr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 2007-12-10 15:03 nam12km
> drwxrwxr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 2007-12-10 15:01 nam-ak
> drwxrwxr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 2007-12-10 14:44 qpf
> drwxrwxr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 2007-12-10 14:37 radar
> drwxrwxr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 2007-12-10 14:40 subc014
> 
> /data/gempak/model/gfs:
> total 220684
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 56509952 2007-12-09 17:01 2007120918_thin.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 56499712 2007-12-09 23:02 2007121000_thin.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 56263168 2007-12-10 05:00 2007121006_thin.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 56452096 2007-12-10 11:03 2007121012_thin.gem
> 
> /data/gempak/model/nam12km:
> total 189252
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 15821312 2007-12-10 14:43 2007121018f000_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16378368 2007-12-10 14:45 2007121018f003_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16514048 2007-12-10 14:47 2007121018f006_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16443392 2007-12-10 14:50 2007121018f009_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16417792 2007-12-10 14:59 2007121018f012_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16410112 2007-12-10 14:54 2007121018f015_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16370176 2007-12-10 14:56 2007121018f018_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16247808 2007-12-10 14:59 2007121018f021_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16142336 2007-12-10 15:01 2007121018f024_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16116736 2007-12-10 14:59 2007121018f027_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 16106496 2007-12-10 15:01 2007121018f030_nam218.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14553600 2007-12-10 15:04 2007121018f033_nam218.gem
> 
> /data/gempak/model/nam-ak:
> total 157200
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14393344 2007-12-10 14:44 2007121018f000_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14822912 2007-12-10 14:47 2007121018f003_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14824448 2007-12-10 14:49 2007121018f006_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14718976 2007-12-10 14:51 2007121018f009_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14652416 2007-12-10 14:52 2007121018f012_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14628864 2007-12-10 14:54 2007121018f015_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14626816 2007-12-10 14:57 2007121018f018_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14668800 2007-12-10 15:01 2007121018f021_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14456320 2007-12-10 15:03 2007121018f024_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14487552 2007-12-10 15:00 2007121018f027_nam242.gem
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 14449152 2007-12-10 15:02 2007121018f030_nam242.gem
> 
> /data/gempak/model/qpf:
> total 1648
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 1682432 2007-12-10 15:03 2007121100_qpe218.gem
> 
> /data/gempak/model/radar:
> total 76
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 71168 2007-12-10 14:37 20071210_radar.gem
> 
> /data/gempak/model/subc014:
> total 80
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 76288 2007-12-10 14:40 200712101930_000_236.gem
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: ULB-565723
Department: Support GEMPAK
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed