This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
John, As mentioned previously, we have received a feed of the NSSL group's LDM product, for evaluation for distributing via our IDD. I added the ability for GEMPAK to display that product. The gzipped NetCDF file is a little awkwrd at the moment, so hopefully another option of NetCDF4 with compression, GRIB2 etc could be done. Steve Chiswell Unidata User Support > Institution: Museum of Science > Package Version: N/A > Operating System: N/A > Hardware Information: N/A > Inquiry: We've been trying to use the FNEXRAD composites for public display > and education - but the problem we've always had with them is that they > suffer from a lack of quality a control. At least last we tried, they were > full of sun beams, clutter, and other artifacts. For our portion of New > England at least, we've been running NSSL's WDSS-II suite and generating our > own much higher quality composites from the NEXRAD2 feed and converting them > into GEMPAK grids for display. The results are stunning. It is my > understanding that NSSL has a big cluster they run WDSS-II on merging every > nexrad site into a national mosiac. Given that it is very possible to > convert the data into GEMPAK grids in real-time, is there any interest in > working with them to inject at least the composite reflectivity mosiac > (MergedReflectivityComposite) into the IDD? > > John > > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: IDT-103545 Department: Support GEMPAK Priority: High Status: Closed