This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Robert, AP and clutter as well as second trip echoes etc requires volumetric as well as velocity and phase informationi (combining satellite imagery can help too!). You might find the information in Steven Vasiloff's March 2005 presentation here enlightening (as well as Ken Howard's May 2005 presentation). http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/community/seminars/ See the section on vertical continuity for Reflectivity QC! Several groups are working on a real-time national 3-D mosaic which we are pursuing for the community on this end, but no time frame at the moment. Steve Chiswell Unidata User Support >From: "Robert Mullenax" <address@hidden> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata >Keywords: 200602142022.k1EKMOO7013926 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > >------_=_NextPart_001_01C631A4.61C14DF6 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >Steve, I don't if we will ever have enough bandwidth to get Level-II = >data at CSBF, but I was intrigued by the answer you provided below while = >I was perusing the archive. Can you elaborate on how you would use = >Level II to do AP removal? =20 > >Thanks, >Robert Mullenax >Senior Meteorologist/Weather Systems Administrator >NMSU/CSBF > > >"Patrick, > >The simplest masking I do with the gridded data is: >GDPFUN =3D mask(n0r,sge(net,5)) > >That only plots the reflectivity where the echo tops are >greater than 5km.=20 > >Our snow in particular can have low tops, so in the precipitation >type plot, I only mask the reflectivity with the echo tops >where the type is rain. > >To do true AP or ground clutter supression requires the level 2 radar > volume rather than the level III products. > >Steve Chiswell >Unidata User Support >" > >------_=_NextPart_001_01C631A4.61C14DF6 >Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> ><HTML> ><HEAD> ><META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = >charset=3Diso-8859-1"> ><META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = >6.5.7638.1"> ><TITLE>AP removal with Level-II data in GEMPAK</TITLE> ></HEAD> ><BODY> ><!-- Converted from text/plain format --> > ><P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Steve, I don't if we will ever have enough = >bandwidth to get Level-II data at CSBF, but I was intrigued by the = >answer you provided below while I was perusing the archive. Can = >you elaborate on how you would use Level II to do AP removal? <BR> ><BR> >Thanks,<BR> >Robert Mullenax<BR> >Senior Meteorologist/Weather Systems Administrator<BR> >NMSU/CSBF<BR> ><BR> ><BR> >"Patrick,<BR> ><BR> >The simplest masking I do with the gridded data is:<BR> >GDPFUN =3D mask(n0r,sge(net,5))<BR> ><BR> >That only plots the reflectivity where the echo tops are<BR> >greater than 5km.<BR> ><BR> >Our snow in particular can have low tops, so in the precipitation<BR> >type plot, I only mask the reflectivity with the echo tops<BR> >where the type is rain.<BR> ><BR> >To do true AP or ground clutter supression requires the level 2 = >radar<BR> > volume rather than the level III products.<BR> ><BR> >Steve Chiswell<BR> >Unidata User Support<BR> >"</FONT> ></P> > ></BODY> ></HTML> >------_=_NextPart_001_01C631A4.61C14DF6-- > -- NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.