[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20050411: Gempak - gpnexr2 problem
- Subject: 20050411: Gempak - gpnexr2 problem
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:54:39 -0600
Russ,
The problem you see may be related to a change in the ctb_dtget routine, where
the last field "0/0" was recently added to the datatype.tbl file, which does
match what you show below. This also corresponds to a change in the cgemlib
routine
ctb_dtget. The 5.7.3 version of the program and the datatype.tbl should not
have the "0/0" field. If the 5.8.1 program were reading the old datatype.tbl
file, that would also be a problem (check GEMTBL setting).
This routine and the last column changes again in 5.8.2, and just verified that
the current library and table are consistent, and work now....but let me know
if you need to investigate further.
Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support.
>From: "Russ Schumacher" <address@hidden>
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200504112031.j3BKVh4Y018973
>--=_eee6f035992ebded9951db7a9f887227
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Institution: Colorado State University
>Package Version: 5.8.1
>Operating System: Linux (Fedora Core 1)
>Hardware Information: Dell PC
>Inquiry: Hello,
>
>Just wanted to alert you to a possible bug in the new release (5.8.1, using pr
> ecompiled Linux binaries).
>
>When I run gpnexr2 using the information below and the attached file, I get th
> e error message:
>
>\"Can\'t read station ID from file, %SITE% not found in template\"
>
>Gempak then plots the radar data at the KFTG radar site (instead of KLSX as sp
> ecified).
>
>I still have the 5.7.3 release of gempak on my machine, so I tried running tha
> t version of gpnexr2, and it works fine. Both versions of nexr2rhi also wor
> k fine (i.e., they put the data at the right position). I noticed several me
> ntions of this problem in the e-mail list archives with older versions, but i
> t seems to have reappeared in 5.8.1.
>
>I also included the NEXRII line from datatype.tbl in case there could be a pro
> blem there.
>
>I\'d appreciate any suggestions for fixing this in 5.8.1 (or if there\'s somet
> hing I\'m doing wrong, please let me know that too!) Thanks for your help.
>
>Thanks,
>Russ Schumacher
>
> MAP Map color/dash/width/filter flag 1
> GAREA Graphics area dset
> PROJ Map projection/angles/margins|dr rad
> RADFIL Radar image filename(s) NEXRII|KLSX
> LATLON Line color/dash/width/freq/inc/l 0
> PANEL Panel loc/color/dash/width/regn 0
> TITLE Title color/line/title 1
> TEXT Size/fnt/wdth/brdr/N-rot/just/hw 1
> CLEAR Clear screen flag YES
> DEVICE Device|name|x size;y size|color xw
> LUTFIL Enhancement lookup table filenam upc_rad24.tbl
> IMCBAR Color/ornt/anch/x;y/ln;wd/freq|t 31/V/LL/.005;.05/.85;.01|.7/1/1/h
> w
> TILT Radar beam elevation/tilt number 0.5
> RADPARM Radar parameter (dz, vr, sw) dz
> RADTIM Radar composite current/dattim 000507/0505
>
>
>NEXRII $RAD/craft/%SITE% %SITE%_YYYYMMDD_HHNN CAT_NIL SCAT
> _NIL 10 2880 6 0/0
>
>
--
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the
Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available
through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made
available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.