[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Differences between GRPHGD in 5.6.d.1 and 5.7.2

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Differences between GRPHGD in 5.6.d.1 and 5.7.2
  • Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:12:58 -0400
Steve,

Thanks for the e-mail about the dcreanal program.  As it turns out, I have 
managed to get my data in the GRIB format, so I don't have to worry about 
converting it to NetCDF.

I did have another question for you.  I did finally use NMAP and the GRPHGD 
program to convert hand analyses to gridded data that I could later plot, which 
I had sent you an e-mail about several weeks ago.  Recently, some of the 
computers in our lab have been upgraded to the newest version of GEMPAK, 5.7.2, 
while the other computers still run GEMPAK 5.6.d.1.  I have tried to create 
some grids on 5.7.2 boxes with VGF files that I created using 5.6.d.1.  When I 
try to use GRPHGD in NMAP on a 5.7.2 box, I get an error message that says:

"Grid data for contouring is all missing or constant."

These VGF files still work to create grids on 5.6.d.1.  Any idea as to what the 
problem may be?  For now I've just continued to use the 5.6 program to create 
my grids, but once those get replaced, I need to know how to use 5.7! Thanks 
again for all your help.

Tom



Tom Green
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC
E-mail: address@hidden