[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20000815: using gempak in script file
- Subject: 20000815: using gempak in script file
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 14:03:19 -0600
>From: address@hidden
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200008151922.e7FJM7N29260
>We have several dozen files with pilot reports. Each file is filled to
>capacity and we cannot reduce the number of files. We want to plot
>data from various times in these files all on the same frame. We
>could have a script files which goes through each of the files but
>what do we use for the DATTIM variable? If DATTIM=all then GEMPAK
>will create a new frame for each time even with CLEAR=no. It seems
>like the only way to get the data plotted all in the same frame is
>to call SFMAP with each date separately. The files each contain several
>dates and times of data and these times are not always consecutive. We
>can't simply loop through the possible times because there may be
>several of the same times in each file under different days. Is there
>a way out of this problem without listing all the dates and times (would
>be cumbersome considering the large number of dates and times)?
>
>Donna Tucker http://chinook.phsx.ukans.edu/tucker.html
>address@hidden Department of Physics and Astronomy
>(785) 864-4738 (new area code!) University of Kansas
>(785) 864-5262 (fax) Lawrence, KS 66045-2151
>
>
>
>
>
Donna,
One solution I have found is to use the PS driver which
does not create separate frames for DATTIM=all. Then, you
can view or print the result as a single frame.
I also provided a program in ~gbuddy/nawips-5.4/contrib/sfctime.tar.Z
which will output the times found within a surface file:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/glimpse/gempak/3733
I believe that this may be a solution where your script could
determine the times in a given file, and then for each one
which matches your plotting criteria, plot with clear=no.
I know this will be slow to execute- but the script should be
fairly short in the loop and generally applicable.
Let me know if you don't think that this will work for you.
Steve Chiswell