This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: Brett Newkirk <address@hidden> >Organization: . >Keywords: 199907220036.SAA07036 >Hi Steve: > >I looked at the interpolation problem a bit more and I ensured that the >warning regarding the output grid having points outside the input grid did >not appear and I still get the same results. I believe that I have all >parts of the thinned grid. In looking at the code, it looks as if you do >account for data outside by giving it RMISSD in gdinterp.f. I am not sure >why this result happens with that in mind. >I will continue to look at this by trying other grids as well. >Thanks, >Brett >> >> Brett, >> >> I'll have to look at how the missing values are handled. I'll look at >> interpolating the AVN thinned to the CED grid you mention. I know I had the > program >> issue a warning if the output grid had points outside the original domain- w > hich >> would be possible with the ETA, but the AVN is global...assuming all 8 parts >> of the grid have been received, so this should not be a problem unless there >> is a seaming problem. >> >> Steve Chiswell > Brett, It might be that I'm averaging a -9999 point with data and coming up with some garbage results. I'll check into this...I'm preparing the Gempak workshop for next week so have to budget time accordingly. Steve Chiswell