|
Model names changing to: eta -> nam avn -> gfs Brent -------- Original Message --------
Brent, My phone is 303-497-8641. I appreciate your response yesterday. In general, I have always preferred to receive the most recent data, and if that meant getting the 18Z run and not the 12Z run, then that was probably the best solution. Steve On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 19:01, Brent Gordon wrote: > Steve, > > Sorry I got busy on other fires and did not get a chance to get back to > my email until now. As 00 UTC is about ready to post, I will not be > sending the 12 UTC run on CONDUIT. > > Is there a number I can reach you in the future when issues like this > pop up? > > Thanks, > > Brent > 301 763-8000 x7193 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Steve Chiswell <address@hidden> > Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 3:53 pm > Subject: Re: No 12 Z GFS run > > > Brent, > > > > Yes, if possible please send the GFS, since some probably need the > > 12Z and not necessarily the 18Z will do. > > > > On part 2, below, the name in the LDM will be the directory and > > file name supplied to the gribinsert program, so as long as > > the gribinsert uses tha MT.gfs and MT.nam path instead of the > > MT.avn and MT.eta, then the LDM name will reflect that change. > > > > I will have to update the gribinsert code at some point to > > add meta data for Model 84 as NAM instead of ETA, but that won't > > effectthe product insertion. That will coordinate with Allan since > > the LDM > > there will have to get upgraded when he rolls the AIX security patches > > onto TGSV32. Again...will not effect TGSV10/11 end of things. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 12:37, Brent Gordon wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > > > > > First, none of the 12 UTC GFS went out from tgsv11 to conduit > > today. Do > > > you want us to resend this now??? > > > > > > Second, does the name on the directory really matter to CONDUIT. > > When > > > we call gribinsert on tgsv32, we supply the file name on AFS as > > an > > > argument. Does gribinsert key off of the directory name? > > > > > > Brent > > > > > > Steve Chiswell wrote: > > > > > > >Brent, > > > > > > > >Since you are on the line (so to speak), > > > >should we set a time to migrate the insertion directory > > > >names from MT.avn to MT.gfs and MT.eta to MT.nam? > > > >I'm assuming that this is just a small change to the > > > >script that is being run from TGSV10/11. > > > > > > > >My first suggestion would be around Wed Dec 15, but > > > >totally flexible (until Jan 18th i believe). > > > > > > > >Thanks always, > > > > > > > >Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 10:54, Brent Gordon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>Conduit users: > > > >> > > > >>We had some networking problems at NCEP this morning. Data are > > now> >>flowing again. > > > >> > > > >>Brent Gordon > > > >>NCEP Central Operations > > > >> > > > >>David Ovens wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>The same is true for us at U. Washington -- no GFS, but the > > ETA came > > > >>>in fine on CONDUIT. > > > >>> > > > >>>On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:34:53AM -0600, Jerrold Robaidek wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>I noticed that we have not received any of the 12 UTC GFS > > data so far. 12 Z > > > >>>>ETAs are making it in fine. > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Anyone know what may be the problem? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Thanks, > > > >>>>:end > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Jerry > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > |