[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 19991214: NLDN Y2K IDD header discussion (cont.)
- Subject: Re: 19991214: NLDN Y2K IDD header discussion (cont.)
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:01:55 -0700
all the executables compiled and ran fine. they appear to be fine for jan 1.
the
current plan is to move to 4 digits per year in file names (and product queue
names)
as far as testing goes (changing the system date to after y2k) if it doesn't
happen
today or wed, it probably won't happen at all since i'm going to be out of town
all
next week.
-sandy
"David J. Knight" wrote:
> Sandy,
> Oops! That is what I get for installing a
> compiler that I don't use (course these days
> you cannot install gcc without also getting g++,
> though without its libraries - go figure, so
> perhaps I can be partially excused)
> Perhaps that is part of the reason I had
> problems getting the package to compile ?-)
>
> You should be all set now. The readme suggests
> that libg++ is obsolete and no longer supported,
> but I installed it for you anyway along with stdc++
> (both in /usr/local/lib)
>
> Since I don't use c++ I couldn't easily test it
> (except for make check) so let me know if
> you have problems or not.
>
> Thanks
> david
> > Hi David,
> >
> > In order to compile the NLDN ingest program on aspen.atmos.albany.edu (or
> > anywhere else for that matter) using gcc2.8.1, I need libstdc++-2.8.1.1 and
> > libg++-2.8.1.1a installed. I'd do it myself and save you the trouble, but,
> > of
> > course, this requires root access.
> >
> > thanks,
> > sandy
> >
> >
> >