[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[CONDUIT #GBP-609047]: Change to SREF in CONDUIT

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [CONDUIT #GBP-609047]: Change to SREF in CONDUIT
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:18:29 -0600
Hi Becky,

re:
> We're a little behind in sending you this item, but we've been working
> on the upcoming August 1st SREF upgrade and we realized it'll have a big
> impact on CONDUIT.  Right now looking at our configuration, CONDUIT gets
> the Eta and RSM members of the SREF, and the bias-corrected ensemble
> products on the 212 grid  (now I see those Carissa!).  Looks like you
> never got the NMM and ARW members when those were put in.

Correct; we never got the NMM and ARW members.

re:
> With this upgrade, the Eta and RSM members are being removed.  So after
> August 1st, we can't send them to you any more.  Our choices are to just
> drop the individual members on the 1st, or add all the members after
> August 1st.   What would you like us to do?

What we would like depends on the impact on the data feed...

Question:

- do you know what the volume/number of products would be if we added
  all the members?

  Really, the important thing is the different in volume/number of products
  AND timing between what we are getting now and what we could get on
  August 1.

re:
> On a related note, Carissa is about to start working with the folks at
> the WOC to get the upgraded CONDUIT machines working.  She'll be in
> touch in the next several weeks to have you all test out a feed from the
> new machines.

We'll be here :-)

re:
> At that point, we'll have a much larger LDM queue to work
> with.

Excellent!

re:
> Maybe we hold off on any additions till after that?

If the volume/# products is a wash (i.e., approx. the same after dropping
the ETA and RSM and adding the NMM and ARW), I think we should move to
the new products as soon as possible (after alerting the CONDUIT community,
of course).  If there is a significant difference in volume/# products
(meaning more after the change), it would be best to wait until after the
move to the new CONDUIT toplevel injection machines.

Cheers,

Tom
--
****************************************************************************
Unidata User Support                                    UCAR Unidata Program
(303) 497-8642                                                 P.O. Box 3000
address@hidden                                   Boulder, CO 80307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unidata HomePage                       http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
****************************************************************************


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: GBP-609047
Department: Support CONDUIT
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed