This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Tony, Your suggestion was well received by the COMET people, so I suspect it will become a casestudy. If not tho' Liz Page indicated that she did store MOST if not all the data associated with the event, so if you need to dump some of your data for space requirements, feel comfortable that we also have it stored here...in anticipation of case development, and we can get all or some desired segment to you via ftp. Thanks again for your input..and have a Happy Halloween, -Jeff ____________________________ _____________________ Jeff Weber address@hidden Unidata Support PH:303-497-8676 NWS-COMET Case Study Library FX:303-497-8690 University Corp for Atmospheric Research 3300 Mitchell Ln http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber Boulder,Co 80307-3000 ________________________________________ ______________________ On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, rockwooa wrote: > Jeff, > > Thanks for following up. I really do think it would make a nice case, but > does it fit into the philosophy COMET has for its cases? Do they choose > their > cases based on the types of storm phenomemena that the NWS deals with, or > would something like this life-cycle case be of interest to them? It > certainly would be useful for teaching, since we are always looking for > examples of basic weather events that can be used to demonstrate fundemental > principles. The entire life-cycle of a 'classic' Low would be very nice, > especially this one that had such a wide variety of interesting weather > associated with it. That's why I started saving it. > > The problem I have it that since it was such a long event (~a week), I don't > have enough room for much imagery. I've kept a bit of satellite and some > radar, but not as much as I think there should be to make a complete data set. > The surface, U/A and model data are no problem. > > Anyway, I think it's a great idea and would vote in favor of it becoming an > official case. > > See ya, > > Tony > > **************************************************************************** > Anthony A. Rockwood > Metropolitan State College of Denver > Meteorology Program > Dept.of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences > P.O. Box 173362, Campus Box 22 > Denver, CO 80217-3362 > > Office: 303.556.8399 > fax: 303.556.4436 > > address@hidden > www.mscd.edu/~eas > > **************************************************************************** > >